Ah, I did completely misunderstand that. It is all such a shock, and I'm still trying to reason it all out, I'm sure you understand. Thank you for straightening that out for me - I thought it a bit odd. I'm sorry that they had to go though that.

So then, would it be correct to say that the riddle from the third party was your first indication that something was wrong? And that you might anticipate another such attack in the future?